A lot of people, with good basis, believe that US controls the world by "diplomatic" intimidation, foreign policies, and through the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The bottom line of course is to protect the interest of America. What people do not know is that there is another organization that controls the US - The Vatican, the Roman Catholic Church.
In their almost 3 decades of formal diplomatic relationship, the US and the Roman Catholic Church have worked together for world domination. There is no other organization in the world other than the Church that has grass root hold in almost all parts of the known world. Vatican is privy to the sentiments worldwide not just of its faithful but the population in general. This gives it good basis for assessing world trends, something very valuable to the US in shaping its policies. Vatican takes advantage of this fact by "filtering" the information it passes on to the US based on the Church's own agenda. The US can push to the world what it wants by military arrogance, economic blackmail, and sheer arrogance. This ability sits well with Vatican. This is exactly what the Church needs to push its own agenda.
The US knows this, and as long as it needs the Vatican, it will be allowed to pass.
Monday, December 26, 2011
WHO RUNS THE WORLD?
Labels:
IMF,
roman catholic church,
US foreign policy,
vatican
Thursday, December 22, 2011
ANTI-BACTERIAL SOAP
Anti-bacterial soaps create super bacteria. No anti-bacterial soap claims to the kill all micro-organisms. If they kill 99% of the bacteria, why is the 1% spared? They are stronger than the rest, that’s why they survived and the rest, the weak ones, were killed. And then what happens next? This stronger strain will now dominate the population and you end up with a bacterial population that is much stronger than the previous before using the antibacterial soap. From this stronger population, the soap will again weed out the weak ones (from the already stronger strains) and the strongest of the strong remain. Is it still a wonder that we have so much new and antibiotic resistant bacteria now that is a worldwide problem?
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
WORLD POPULATION, USA, CHURCH
US government wants to push population control worldwide, especially in developing countries where natural resources abound. More people mean more consumers which will deplete the natural resources. Less natural resources that the US can use and exploit is not a scenario the US government wants. Read the Kissinger Report.
On the opposing side, the Roman Catholic Church strongly campaigns for the rejection of any "unnatural" act to prevent procreation (except the Rhythm Method which they all know are ineffective) or any program to curb the human population. Opus Dei, a very conservative Catholic congregation, even encourages its lay members to have a lot of children. Lower population means less church-goers and therefore less revenues from collections and other church services.
Issues of morality, health, poverty, quality of life, and whatever ideas the proponents and opponents of the idea hurl at each other are just a smoke-screen.
On the opposing side, the Roman Catholic Church strongly campaigns for the rejection of any "unnatural" act to prevent procreation (except the Rhythm Method which they all know are ineffective) or any program to curb the human population. Opus Dei, a very conservative Catholic congregation, even encourages its lay members to have a lot of children. Lower population means less church-goers and therefore less revenues from collections and other church services.
Issues of morality, health, poverty, quality of life, and whatever ideas the proponents and opponents of the idea hurl at each other are just a smoke-screen.
Labels:
catholic,
church,
kissinger,
population,
RH bill
GOD, HEAVEN, HELL
I do not believe in God, at least not in the god of the Judeo-Chistian religion, not anymore. This wasn’t brought about by something tragic that happened in my life which brought me a lot of suffering and made me question God’s character or his existence. The concept of god that was I was taught since I was a child simply did not seem sensible anymore. I was born a Catholic and the concept of a god ingrained in my brain is the Holy Trinity of God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I am not in a position nor do I have the experience to talk about the gods of the other religions.
First of all, I do not believe that God is a “HE.” Or a “SHE.” God is neither, and therefore, an “IT,” and that is the pronoun I am going to use to refer to it. It is not my intention to reduce God to an object by referring to it as IT. This is just an inherent limitation of the English language.
I do not believe that it has gender and I certainly do not believe in its role as a family member – father, son, or whatever. I do not believe in a family of gods.
To personify a god is to limit it. I do not believe that it has a personality, that it can be angry or loving or vengeful or just. It just is.
To believe in this kind of god limits the mental and spiritual growth because all logic, reason, and quest for truth and knowledge ends with the belief in a god. “God said so” or “This is how God wants it.” You know how it is. You cannot even think for yourself because your priests and ultimately the Pope tell you what to think. You just think that you can think freely but you’re only allowed thoughts and ideas that are in accordance with the teachings of your religion. Defy this and it’s the sea of fire for you. Now hell is another issue.
I do not believe in Hell. Neither do I believe in Heaven. The concept of heaven and hell are the punishment and reward tools of control. Very much similar when a child is told to behave or the big bad wolf will get him. Or be nice so Santa Claus will give him gifts.
Doing good things motivated by heavenly rewards and avoiding evil for fear of hellish punishments are immature. Spiritual juveniles, I call them. Good should be done because it is the right thing to do. Bad should be avoided because it is not the right thing to do. If there is no Heaven, would the religious still do good? If there is no hell, would they still hold themselves from committing sin?
ABOUT THIS BLOG
This is not a happy blog. If you’re looking for some positivity, this is not it.
I do not intend to inspire, teach, empower, nor touch anyone’s life.
The entries here are merely the expressions of the dark side of my mind. I call it “dark” not because it’s evil or bad (but then, it might be). I call it as such because this is the part of me where I keep my thoughts that never saw the light of day or I never went public with, thoughts that remained hidden in my subconscious. This is also where my pessimistic or controversial views of the world are housed– religion, politics, health, and practically anything I do not agree with.
This is my online black diary. I do not expect other people to read this but since you’re already here, go ahead and see what goes on in a man’s twisted mind. I will not be accountable for its effect(s) on you. Tread lightly and at your own risk.
A lot of entries are unpopular. I do not need comments. You can agree or disagree with me and with each other for all I care. Most of the time, I won’t be reading the comments section anyway. It’s just there because I know that a lot of blog readers have a natural need to react and be heard. So go knock yourself out.
You’re still here? Can you now feel the general mood of this blog? Is this really what you want to read? Are you merely curious? Or did you just about have enough and you’re ready to leave this page? Whatever the case, you do what you want. As for me, I’ll just keep writing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)